Interview with Tzvi (Greg) Lauren – co-founder of Heart of Israel Wines
This segment of the series of articles “Rebirth of Shomron” has been fermenting “in the barrel”, so to speak, for the last half year. In honor of Rosh Chodesh Adar – the new Hebrew month in which we celebrate Purim, specifically with wine, I would like to bring out this “vintage” article. But much has changed since…
I met Tzvi over a year ago in New Jersey. Being that I love Israeli wine, and he imports it, we instantly started thinking of ways we can integrate our entrepreneurial ideas to advance Torah and Wine. It was not until this past Saturday night (February 11, 2018), that our plans came to fruition.
Tasting and Torah was an intimate evening organized by Heart of Israel Wines, featuring a selection of wines from Shiloh Wines. Speakers included Tzvi and his partner Yehoshua, Amichai Lourie – winemaker for Shiloh Winery, Rabbi Yair Shachor -from the community of Ma’aleh Levona, and myself. We hope that this is the first of many such events.
This interview took place in the summer, when Tzvi’s company was still called “West Bank Wines”. The old name itself was controversial, and has a story you will hear about in the interview. A few notes (from Tzvi himself) about the new name:
The company is now starting to import its own wines, and with their main customers being people in middle America, it made sense to have something simple, catchy, which still bears a connection to what it is about, and is not politically charged. Furthermore, after many requests from residents of Judea and Samaria, and promises to change the name, they finally owned up to their word and changed it.
Practically, Judea and Samaria is too long a name. They went for something universal and simple. Since heartofisraelwines.com would have also been way too long, the new top level domain “.wine” adds some panache to the new website, and here it is!
Tzvi was born in Ukraine and grew up in the NYC metro area. With a background on Wall St., he made aliyah to Israel in 2010. The story of West Bank Wines started in 2015 with a chance encounter, while Tzvi was working for a an NGO called World Yisrael Beytenu. From there Tzvi began working on building an American brand for Lev Ha’olam, a company distributing various boutique goods from mom & pop producers in Judea & Samaria.
Tzvi eventually realized that the product he had a calling for was actually hiding in plain sight and pivoted the project to wine.
After looking up Israeli Wineries through Google Maps, Tzvi brought a list to his now business partner Yehoshua Werth in Monsey, NY, and they now regularly feature wines from Judea and Samaria, and you can follow their reviews and events on social media. He then set out to start visiting a few: Har Bracha, Shiloh, Hebron and Beit El wineries, all along Route 60.
Tune in for some stories about these valuable connections, and the world that it opened to him. These wineries are run by very special people, who are keenly aware of the place they live in, and the revival of Judea & Samaria through its booming wine industry. Every winery has a Biblical and Jewish history story linked with the location, and that story is the key to appreciating the wine. As Erez Ben Saadon of Tura Winery said, “When you love the Land, the Land loves you back”. A land that was mostly desolate for near two millennia becoming fruitful and productive again is a testament to the deep love of a people to their homeland.
The name “West Bank” Wines naturally had people raise their hackles, on both sides of the fence. Tzvi talks about how he arrived at this name as well as some of the reactions he has received, and the impact it had on his resolve to keep the name…which has now changed to Heart of Israel Wines.
Some fascinating research has been done into the grapes indigenous to the region, the history of how these grapes were forgotten, and how the grapes we now have in Israel, got there. That, and other areas of history, research and stories are discussed.
We hope you enjoy!
Links to content from the interview
Articles and Videos:
- Dr. Shivi Drori, Ariel University, on the revival of 2,000 year old grapes: Here is a link to a short video on the science of reviving the grape, and here is the full lecture.
- Professor Ian McGonigle, Harvard University, and his article about Israeli Wine in Times of Israel.
Heart of Israel Wines reviews:
- Review of 2000 ancient Israel wine and reenactment of the Incense ritual in the Temple
- Review of the Psagot Peak.
Three reviews by 2007 world #1 sommelier Andreas Larsson:
- Mount Hevron – Reserve Syrah 2009 – Judean Hills
- Psâgot – Single Vineyard 2013 – Benjamin Mountains
- Gvaot – Masada 2012 – Judean Hills
“And in that day…the strayed who are in the land of Assyria…shall come and worship G-d on the holy mount, in Jerusalem (Isaiah 27:13)”
The mystery surrounding the vanishing of the Ten Tribes and their current whereabouts is nowhere near unraveled. Although recent studies into the topic have picked up the gauntlet, it is still shrouded in mystery.
Even the legends we have about their whereabouts are mysterious, or perhaps even mystical: Somewhere beyond the magical Sambation River , named for its impassable torrential currents which only settle on the Sabbath, effectually undermining any attempt to cross it during the week— as the Lost Tribes beyond it are all Sabbath-observant. Thus, they are in effect cut off from the rest of civilization. Google Earth, anyone?
While I cannot comment on that tradition, I would like to revisit the story of the exile itself, and raise some questions and usable aspects for a conversation about the Ten Lost Tribes.
In my first article in this series, “Wine and Prophecy: The Rebirth of Shomron”, I discussed the basic biblical narrative. From passages of Assyrian and Babylonian chronologies, as well as verses in Jeremiah and in the Talmud, it appears that the story isn’t as simple as it seems.
In this article, I will explore three areas:
- Factoids from Assyrian and Babylonian records.
- Lost or amongst us?
- What hat did they wear? Implications towards religious practice.
Assyrian and Babylonian Records
First Waves of Assyria
The appearance of Assyria on the Biblical scene is very early on, and helps us relate to the names of important cities pertinent to excavations in Ancient Near Eastern archaeology: Babylon, Akkad (Akkadian), Nineveh, Kalah (Calah, Kalhu, etc), Uruk (Erekh), etc:
Kush also begot Nimrod, who was the first man of might on earth.
He was a mighty hunter by the grace of G-d; hence the saying, “Like Nimrod a mighty hunter by the grace of G-d.”
The mainstays of his kingdom were Babylon, Erech, Akkad, and Kalneh in the land of Shinar.
From that land Asshur went forth and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-ir, Kalah, and Resen between Nineveh and Kalah, that is the great city. (Gen 10:8-12)
A visit to any major museum containing Assyrian or Babylonian artifacts is bound to have references to some of these cities, which are the biblical setting of many stories.
First Mention of the Kings of Israel
The Assyrian Empire came on the scene before the Kingdom of Israel became subjugated to, and ultimately destroyed by, the Assyrian Empire in stages. For example, King Menahem, who ruled in Samaria a few years before the first exile, paid tribute to Tiglath Pileser III (II Kings 15:19-20), which appears on a royal stele in the Israel Museum. But this is from when the Assyrian Empire started expanding quickly and aggressively, of what is called the Neo-Assyrian Empire period.
In Assyrian record, earlier kings of Israel are mentioned paying tribute to the kings Ashurnasirpal II and Shalmaneser III, when Assyria was not in this expansion phase, but merely had dominance over some areas in Syria, which was short-lived (Van de Mieroop, M. p. 242-244).
In the Assyrian Kurkh Monolith, attributed to Ashurnasirpal II and Shalmaneser III, currently in the British Museum, Ahab King of Israel appears, and the House of Omri.
In the Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III, also in the British Museum, King Yehu prostrates before the king (image below), escorted by tribute bearers. Both these kings lived roughly a century before the Neo-Assyrian Empire came on the scene.
Phoenicia and the Rebellion of Israel
The Neo-Assyrian involvement with Israel and Judah came when, according to II Kings 16:5, Kings Rezin of Aram (Damascus) and Pekah of Israel formed a coalition against King Ahaz of Judah. Their coalition was intended to block Ahaz from joining the Assyrian Empire and to keep out its foreign influence, a move which had devastating consequences to both Aram and Israel.
Ahaz became vassal to Assyria (ibid, 7), and thus saved his skin from the attack of the former two kings. However, what is not mentioned in the Biblical account is that there was another king involved in this coalition (Cogan, M. p. 67-72): Hiram of Tyre. 
The Phoenician King, bearing a similar name to the earlier Hiram who assisted Solomon in the building of the Temple in Jerusalem (I Kings 5:15), was no newcomer on the scene. The kingdoms of Israel and Phoenicia were allies since back in Ahab’s time, who married Jezebel daughter of Ethbaal of Tyre (I Kings 12:31). Besides building a house of worship for the Phoenician god Baal (ibid), Ahab also built himself an ivory house (II Kings 22:39). Fragments of ivory have been excavated in Ahab’s capital in ancient Samaria, known as the “Samaria Ivories”.
Back to our story – King Pekah of Israel is killed in a coup, and Hoshea assumed the throne (II Kings 15:30). According to Assyrian records, Hoshea was confirmed by Tiglath Pileser as king and vassal (Cogan M. p.72-76).
Hoshea rules Samaria for nine years (II Kings 17:1-6), while subjugated to Shalmaneser V. He is later caught sending an envoy to Egypt – a clear act of rebellion against Assyria – and is ultimately destroyed along with the deportation of the remainder of the Ten Tribes.
The surprise is that there was another king who takes credit for the capturing of Samaria. A king who is only mentioned once in the Bible, in relation to a campaign to Ashdod (Isaiah 20:1): Sargon II.
Sargon, who assumed the throne after Shalmaneser V, claims to have captured Samaria and been involved in the deportation process (Cogan p. 90-102). Even Babylonian chronicles attribute this capturing to him (Cogan, M. p. 209-211, 214). The subject of Sargon’s involvement in the region, and the way he records his campaign, is fascinating. For this article, as a segue into the next topic, I note just one point. While the initial campaign of Assyria Samaria, and its deportation, was initiated by Shalmaneser, it was clearly taking place over a prolonged period of time, in which at least one more king, if not several, were involved.
Lost or Amongst Us?
How long did it take to deport the Ten Tribes?
Mass deportation, while having existed earlier in Assyria, is a hallmark of Neo-Assyrian conquests. Different levels existed, from the deportation of specialist craftspeople to assist in various building projects, to deportation of entire regions – depending on its level of defiance (Van de Mieroop, M. p. 230-236).
This practice had several strategic benefits to the Assyrian Empire, while providing labour and people to build and inhabit its new cities. It reduced the opposition in the peripheral territories, as rebellious populations were resettled in foreign environments where they needed imperial protection against local hostility. Moreover, they would not escape, as they were unfamiliar with the country. Nor did they have the territorial imperative of fighting for their homeland. Nor did they have an organic group of their countrymen who would band together, as they were dispersed over wide areas, to either side of the Assyrian Empire’s homeland (according to Prof. Ran Zadok of Tel Aviv U.).
Furthermore, the territories of deported people were selectively resettled with other groups when they were crucial for trade or for the production of goods. This means that deportation was done very strategically, based on the skills of the deportees, and the necessities of the empire. For example, an area best suited for agriculture would be settled by agrarian peoples, and not by nomads.
And lastly, the supervision and feeding of large numbers of people during a voyage of several months must have required enormous organization, surprisingly not recorded for us.
All of this points to an important fact: Deportation was a gradual, and expensive, bureaucratic and administrative process. The deportation of the Ten Tribes could not have been carried out all at once, and while the area was being repopulated with foreigners who will come to be known as the Samaritans (II Kings 17:24-34), it is highly likely that members of the Ten Tribes continued to inhabit their homeland for decades after the destruction.
As mentioned in my previous article, the Seder Olam attributes the deportation to Sennacherib.
The book of Ezra describes how, during the rebuilding of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, Samaritans requested to assist in its building, noting that they have been integral to this land from the time of Esarhaddon (Ezra 4:2) – the successor of Sennacherib; while other nations’ presence is attributed to the last of the mighty Assyrian Kings – Ashurbanipal (ibid. 10)
All of this may help us understand how Jeremiah could fathomably have identified members of the Ten Tribes, and brought some of them back.
Jeremiah (3:6-26) describes a mission in which the prophet was sent to the north to bring back the lost tribes.
“Go, make this proclamation toward the North, and say: Turn back, O Rebel Israel—declares G-d. I will not look on you in anger, for I am compassionate—declares G-d; I do not bear a grudge for all time.”
Rav Yehuda Landy suggests that this was possible during the reign of Josiah King of Judah , since the Assyrian Empire was on a decline (p. 111). But this all points to a curious discussion about the preservation of some of the tribes in the nick of time. 
Are the Ten Tribes completely lost?
It is possible that those who remained suspended, awaiting deportation, had some interaction with, or influence from, Judea.
King Hezekiah (II Chro. ch. 30) sent invitations to Ephraim and Manasseh to join him in the Passover celebrations in Jerusalem, and some accepted the invitation, even staying in Judea.
The Talmud in Pesachim 4a  discusses how a person’s manner of speech may reveal an innate tribal association. (Writing this right after the public Torah reading of Vayechi, which describes the blessings of the various tribes, this seems quite timely.)
A certain man would regularly say whenever involved in conflict: Adjudicate my case [dunu dini]. The Sages said: Learn from it that he descends from the tribe of Dan, as it is written: “Dan will judge [ya-din] his people like one of the tribes of Israel” (Genesis 49:16).
The tribe of Dan was one of those exiled, as was Zebulun:
A certain man would regularly walk and say: The bushes on the seashore are cypresses, i.e., items located by the sea are more beautiful than those found in other places. They examined his lineage and found that he descends from the tribe of Zebulun, as it is written: “Zebulun shall dwell by the seashore” (Genesis 49:13).
All of these reveal some cracks in the notion that they are completely gone. But the mystery of the vanishing of the majority of their contingencies, still remains one of the big mysteries of Jewish History.
What Hat did They Wear? Implications towards Religious Practice
If you were to go on an expedition to find the Lost Tribes, what would you look for? What traditions, rituals or stories would you expect to find, that might shed light on Jewish origins?
Wait, Jewish origins?
After 2,000 years, we have grown used to identifying ourselves as Jews—of Judah.
What would the other Ten Tribes think of that?
Remember that the Ten Tribes succeeded from the Kingdom of Judah, actively denouncing any association with the Kingdom of Judah (I Kings 12:16). In fact, a member of the Kingdom of Israel would have probably taken offense at being called “Jew”.
“Are you talking to me?”
“I’m not from Judah—how dare you? I’m from Zebulun / Dan / Naphtali / Gad / Asher…”
Two kingdoms, geographically separated, ideologically unassociated, and often at war—for over two centuries. We are talking about different entities. And speaking of religion, the Kingdom of Israel on the surface seems to be a largely secular-oriented kingdom [Disclaimer: The Talmud and Midrashic literature record many significant interactions, discussions and events from the Kings of Israel, and the populace of Northern Israel demonstrating how they were very much in dialogue with tradition and religious practice. I would not dare subtract from that, and hope to do it better justice in the future]. The foreign influences, political marriages—the subject of much prophetic rebuke—and far-reaching trade and conquests, distinguished Israel from the more traditional Judah, with the Temple of Solomon in its capital, Jerusalem.
As for the Temple: For a long period of time, the kingdom of Israel forbade the pilgrimage to the Temple, seeing it as a threat to its own stability. 
And what is Judaism, if not a ritualistic “survival kit” for Jews in the diaspora, maintaining its adherers’ association with their land and tradition while in exile, with no land nor sovereignty. Most of what we would call religion, be it standardized prayers, blessings or rituals, and even the codification of the Oral Law into the Mishna and Talmud, were created after the Assyrian Exile, primarily by people of Judah.
And to really drive the point home. The method of Assyrian deportation was carefully constructed to insure that repopulated groups do not congregate in any meaningful way that would enable rebellion. The exile itself was so aggressive and abrupt, what means of scholarship would have survived in any form, and with the time required, to enable it to contemplate a religion?
All of that considered, what percentage of the society was learned enough to maintain a strong identity?
The Babylonian Exile was largely tranquil, once Jews settled in Babylon. Jews had a lot of autonomy, and scholarship was maintained, with the wherewithal to contemplate this newfound existence without a land or a Temple.
So what would you find, if you were to identify a descendant of any of the Tribes?
It is not clear, but the likelihood of finding anything that would be recognizable to us is highly unlikely . That is probably why the Return of the Ten Lost Tribes is the stuff of Messianic proportions.
The fate of the Ten Tribes is tragic, indeed. And in direct proportion, so is the rebuilding of their land.
This is why the rebuilding of Shomron today is so bewildering, marvelous and miraculous.
In the spirit of this past week’s public Torah reading, which describes the death of Rachel on the road, foreshadowing the exile of her children. But there is still home, and her children will indeed come back home again.
Thus said G-d: A cry is heard in Ramah— Wailing, bitter weeping— Rachel weeping for her children. She refuses to be comforted For her children, who are gone.
Thus said G-d: Restrain your voice from weeping, Your eyes from shedding tears; For there is a reward for your labor —declares G-d: They shall return from the enemy’s land.
And there is hope for your future —declares G-d: Your children shall return to their home. (Jeremiah 31:14-16)
 Cf. Yalkut Shimoni, Isaiah, 469.
 See also Cogan’s book Bound for Exile, Jerusalem: Carta 2013, which is a continuation of The Raging Torrent, and which focuses on the material about the exiles in their respective locations.
Note on the second edition of The Raging Torrent, for the connoisseur: There are significant differences between Cogan’s first and second editions, in terms of the sources used for Assyrian royal documents. I have asked the author about it. Prof. Cogan told me that Luckenbill’s two volume book included translations of the documents that were known in the beginning of the twentieth century. It was published in 1926-1927. However, more studies have emerged over the following decades and many more documents published, requiring revised translations. That is why he instead used Leichty for Esarhaddon, and more.
 Cf. Talmud Megillah 14b.
 The Mishnah in Sanhedrin (10:3) discusses the place of the Ten Tribes in the world to come, and the possibility of their return. Rashi points out that Jeremiah only brought back some of them.
 Translation taken from sefaria.org.
 Unfortunately, in stark contrast to the Olympics, contemporary with this period of time. The Olympics were panhellenistic rituals in honor of Zeus and Hera. Greek cities which were at war with each other, would lay down their arms, and compete for glory, through sports!
 I owe thanks to Rabbi Joey Dweck for this perspective.
Cogan, M. The Raging Torrent, Historical Inscriptions from Assyria and Babylonia Relating to Ancient Israel. Second Updated & Expanded Edition. Carta, Jerusalem (2008).
לנדי, י. ואלה דברי ימי ירמיהו. תקופת ירמיהו הנביא: סקירה היסטורית, גיאוגרפית וארכיאולוגית
קולמוס הפצת ספרים, ירושלים (2016).י
Van de Mieroop, M. A History of the Ancient Near East ca. 3000-323 B.C. Second edition. Blackwell Publishing (2007).
Before I take you to the ancient Philistine city of Gath (Tell es-Safi, or תל צפית), I’d like to tell you how I got there. It all started in March 30 in New York, when I went to a symposium in the Center for Jewish History, called “In the Valley of David and Goliath: Digging up the Evidence of the United Monarchy”. If you haven’t yet been to – or heard about – Khirbet Quiayafa (Biblical Sha’arayim. See I Samuel 17:52) – then you should definitely look it up: http://qeiyafa.huji.ac.il/
And if you will be in Jerusalem anytime from September 22, 2016, you would be in for a special treat if you visit the Bible Lands Museum: http://www.blmj.org/en/
The museum is hosting the exhibition “In the Valley of David and Goliath”, showcasing the latest finds from that site. Some of these sites have changed the pages of history, and they all have exciting stories. Don’t miss it!
While getting to know different people who attended the events, I met Professor Jill Katz of Yeshiva University. It turns out that she was going to be part of an expedition to Tel es-Safi, and she invited me to the dig, if I will be in Israel. At the time I wasn’t sure I was going to make it, but as it turned out – I did!
Getting in touch ahead of time with Dr. Aren Maeir, the director of the expedition, I got permission to film some footage from the site, and to conduct several interviews with archaeologists. That itself would be an important task, but I was there to get down and dirty with uncovering history. Luckily, I was able to do both, and I am now going to share it with you!
But before I do, please make sure to check out Dr. Maeir’s blog, which was updated almost daily during the excavation and surely has lots of exciting footage:
In this article, I will share some of my personal experiences at the dig, as well as some of the things I learned from the interviews I conducted on site. Hopefully soon, I plan to post the entire transcripts with videos and footage of, and relating to, the interviews.
Interviews I succeeded in recording:
- Dr. Aren Maeir – Bar Ilan University
- Professor Jill Katz – Yeshiva University
- Dr. Daniel Warner – Head of the Tel Gezer Excavations (check out www.telgezer.com and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Warner)
An altar uncovered in previous excavations of es-Safi (ca. 2011). The altar is important because it teaches about Philistine ritual, and their cultural relationship to the neighboring nations at the time. Picture from the article: http://www.haaretz.co.il/news/education/1.1181642
Day 1: Monday, July 12, 2016
It is said that the best way to learn a foreign language is through immersion. Well, I learned a lot of archaeological terminology through immersion. With abbreviations such as “EB”, “MB” and “LB” thrown around (Respectively: Early, Middle and Late Bronze Age), I was immersed in conversation about different excavations, comparative analyses of finds, and biblical references. I also met a whole lot of interesting people, who came to learn through the digging into the dust of the land.
I was working in “Area P”, while further up the Tel was “Area E”. I was immediately assigned a square to work in, learning quickly terms such as “banketim” (Hebrew for the ramps which outline the 5×5 Meter square areas into which a site is typically divided), usage of pickaxes and types of shovels, what is “topsoil” and what are “mud bricks”, uttered in a number of accents, from Hebrew and Russian to Korean.
It was a crowded day at the site. Besides myself and many other volunteers of all ages, there was a group of Yeshiva University students who joined for the day, as well as a group of Israeli soldiers. Apparently, their commanders decided it would be a good idea to spice it up a bit and join a dig for a couple days.
“But why Tel es-Safi”, you ask? I’ll let Dr. Maeir answer that:
“…it is a site which is identified as Gath, one of the five cities of the Philistines known from the Bible (Introduced in Joshua 13:3, and then several times throughout Judges and Samuel), and we find here substantial remains of the Philistines and their culture. And more specifically, we can talk about various historical events that are mentioned in the biblical texts, such as the conquest of Gath by Hazael which is mentioned in II Kings 12:18, and we can find the remains of the destruction of the site at the time”
We spoke earlier about the battle of David against the giant Philistine, Goliath. Gath was his very own hometown!
“We know of the importance of Gath to the Philistines in the stories relating to David…and we can find the remains of a very, very impressive city at the time.
“We hear the story of David who is escaping from Saul, and meeting Achish king of Gath – faking [to be] mad – and we excavated the gate of Gath. Even though it is not necessarily that gate (which David wrote all over in his apparent madness)…it gives us a nice idea of what a gate at that time looked like.”
I can say, personally, that when I had the historic context of where I was digging, it made the uncovering of pottery shards, jug handles and even a flint blade – a lot more exciting!
When I asked Professor Katz why we should come and dig, she said “…the amazing thing about it is that we really do not know what we are going to find. And the only way to find what’s here, is to dig! It is the only way to find out.”
We found out a lot about the site. I think that the most important lesson I took from this day is how impressive this city was. When we read about it in Tanach, it’s basically yet another nameless city, which had nameless villains who are long gone. But through this experience, I know now more about these people and their lifestyle, as well as the impact that this city might have had on my hillside-dwelling ancestors. In the words of Professor Katz:
“…this site, is a wonderful site. I think the first thing that anybody coming to the site would notice…is you get the sense of the scale. This is a huge site in the ancient world, something on the order of 500 dunam (around 123 acres), which is probably around ten times the size of Jerusalem in the Iron Age I period (1150-1000 BCE, estimated time of King David and King Solomon). The philistines were formidable. Even though they were just in the southern coastal plain, they were a real power. They came and built large cities, cities that were fortified, cities that…would have dominated the region. So I think that working at Gath, and knowing that we are really at the beginning of the foothills, you get a sense of what the Israelites living in the hillside must have felt when they looks down from the hills to the foothills, and knew there was this huge city there, with a population that was well organized, and quite affluent, on a relative scale”.
And I did say that there were surprises. One of those “small world” surprises: Uri Shalmon, my neighbor from Highland Park was digging there for the day, with Yeshiva University. Israel – it’s where these things happen!
Day 2: Wednesday, July 14
I was infused, energized, motivated. I wanted to share this excitement with my friends. Convincing two of my friends, Josh and Mark, to join me, we made our way to another day at Safi. The way it goes is everyone starts setting up and digging before day break, around 5:45. Then, at 7:00 we have a coffee break. At 9:00 we have breakfast, and at 11:00 there is a “watermelon break” – exciting to us, but to those on the site every day for the past few weeks, the same drill gets rather boring. 12:00 is when we start wrapping up and getting on buses. Once everyone gets to the lodging (Kibbutz Revadim), there is the pottery wash activity, which I did not participate on this site. I did in the next site I visited, but that is for another article.
On this day I was assigned a different area. Lo and behold, two small world surprises: In the same spot that Josh, Mark and I were working, Josh found a neighbor from his street in his hometown of St. Louis, and I bumped into the older sister of my student, from New Jersey.
This day was a particularly intensive say, but not as crowded. This was basically the last day of digging, and everything had to be wrapped up, documented, and prepared for inspection. That is the main reason I was unable to interview Amit Dagan – he was extremely preoccupied with finishing up the dig with as much clarity as possible. It was truly inspiring to watch him hop from spot to spot, feeling the earth, examining, conversing about it.
There is a lot of information that was learned on this site, both about the site itself, and about the contributions of archaeology to our classrooms and text-based lessons. I would like to dedicate a separate article to the three interviews (and corresponding footage) that I recorded here, because there are so many interesting things that expand outward. For example, Dr. Dan Warner directs the dig in Tel Gezer, another biblical site, and is also working on innovative methods for bringing sites to life in the classroom. These things deserve their own spotlight.
To sum up the second day at Tel es-Safi, I think the most important lesson I learned is from the interview with Prof. Katz: Archaeology teaches us about the life of the common people, while history is written by the victor. In her own words:
“I think that Archaeological studies are a good compliment to historical studies. In the sense that…the general approach is that this is reflecting the elite culture, maybe the male culture, but this is something that is written by the victors. And so, there’s whole swaps of people and of life that are not really reflected in history.”
Indeed, when it comes to the Philistines, this is very true. But we know a lot about our interactions with them. What about the “seven nations” who settled the land? We are commanded to inherit the land and send those people away – or fight them. But why? Who are they? What is their story? What remains of them? These are all intriguing questions. Every morning in the prayers we review in brief the history of Abraham through David, talking about the covenant to Abraham who is given inheritance of the “Land of the Canaanites: The Hittites, the Amorites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites and the Girgashites (Geshurites?)” nations forgotten from the annals of history, and if not for our daily mention of them, who would remember them? What do we know about them, indeed?
“…you can find out what the kings and queens were doing, and what the elite were doing, but you don’t necessarily know what the average person was doing.
So I think what the big advantage of archaeology is that we have the opportunity to…find the remains of almost everybody…there is a lot of emphasis, particularly today, in excavating a farmstead, investigating just the daily life of regular people.
The number one find that we find in archaeological sites are ceramic remains, pots. Ceramics is something that everybody used, it was ubiquitous.
A king or queen – they would have fancy pots. But the average person still had to use pots for storing food, for preparing food, serving food, eating food. Everybody was using it.
So I think the best thing about archaeology is that it reflects sort of the general population as well as the elite population. And it reminds us that, you know, most of us are not necessarily in the elite. So you get a sense of what the majority of people were like.”
A very humbling thought, indeed. Who would have thought that digging in the dust reminds us that, well, we should also be humble. As Abraham said:
Abraham spoke up, saying, “Here I venture to speak to my Lord, I who am but dust and ashes” (Genesis 18:27)
“Where are you from?”
“I’m from Israel”
“Yeah, but before that”
“Like I said, I’m from Israel”
I was Born in Jerusalem, and raised in the Old City. A true “Rovah boy” (Rovah = jargon for the Jewish Quarter). There are many children with English speaking parents who grew up in the Rovah, so it is quite understandable that people suspect I’m not native Israeli. It also helped that I had a classmate in seventh-grade, from Chicago, who inspired me to work on my English. You’ll catch me in my spelling and gaps in cultural knowledge. Little did I know that would set me on a path that would lead me to the United States, almost fifteen years later.
So now, the conversation usually carries on as follows:
“Where do you live?”
“I live in Highland Park, NJ”
“Wait, you’re from the Rovah? What are you doing in a place like this?”
Good question. A question I have to ask myself daily. On the days I don’t, I wonder if I’ve been here too long. But you can’t take Jerusalem out of a Rovah boy. What am I doing in a place like this? In this article, I’d like to share with you some practical thoughts about that.
Here’s another point, which I’ll soon connect to the previous one. After three years of teaching in New York and New Jersey (with the annual visit home), I came to Israel for a month (July-August 2016) – probably the most intensive month I’ve spent in Israel in my whole life. But why should you care? Allow me to explain.
While in the US, I’ve taught in several different settings: From classes and activities in schools and summer camps to presentations and learning groups with communities and college students. At the heart of what I share there is always the deep love for where I grew up: The Rovah, Jerusalem the Land of Israel and even beyond (well, Jordan). Much of my instruction was based on the thrust of having come from Israel, but it was circumstance that lead me to relate those things. I’m an educator, and I teach mostly Tanach and Judaic Studies, so naturally I talk about what I know from home.
That thought dawned on me as I contemplated a museum tour I guided in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Let me backtrack. Around November 2015, I prepared a tour for my Middle School, focusing on Assyria and Babylon. My own preparation was laborious, and the students also had to prepare via texts, videos and other media. Since the Tenth of Tevet was coming up (marking the day that Nebuchadnezzar lay siege on Jerusalem), I felt the need to give the students a basic understanding of who is Babylon. They are not merely a nameless villain on the pages of history. Babylon was a culture that changed the world, making a powerful impact on us that lasts until today, from the Babylonian Talmud to the names of the month, and of course – the destruction of the First Temple (586 BCE).
The students were also learning the book of Melachim (Kings), and it felt appropriate to include Assyria as well: Who were the Assyrians, what was their impact on us? Where are the Ten Tribes? And what happened to the Assyrians? Many of us have visited King Chizkiyahu’s (Ezekiah) water cistern, and even seen the defense wall he built – right under my parents’ house (see image below) – against Sennacherib. So who was he, and what was the big deal?
At first, the museum tour was meant to be an out-of-school experience and activity, nothing more. But then I realized how much of an impact it had on the students, and how this can me something much more. That is when I decided to go to Israel, and this time, to consciously invest in learning about the broader context in which Tanach took place.
On my short visit, I participated in two archaeological expeditions (Tel Lachish, and Tel es-Safi or Ancient Gat), field-trip conventions for educators, I visit other important sites (City of David, Givati parking lot) and museum exhibits (‘Pharaoh in Canaan’, among others in the Israel Museum and Bible Lands Museum), and met with various experts and educators. On two of the sites, I interviewed archaeologists about how the relevance of what they do to our learning and understanding. So yes, this has a lot to do with us.
In the upcoming articles, I will hopefully share with you some of the experiences from those places, as well as the transcription and video of the interviews.
Meanwhile, I am taking all of this, and am going back to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. But this time, I am going with a purpose. It is to make the most I can of “a place like this” – a place where we I can find things that will connect us to the text, enhance our understanding of the stories we’ve learned, and hopefully amplify our connection to the Land of Israel, and our Jewish Identity. I am developing a series of tours aimed at enhancing our understanding of things like the Seven Nations, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome. As an artist, I can’t ignore the “Museum of Art” part of “The Metropolitan”, and in the programs I’m developing I intend to make available an art program, as I did with my own Middle School.
Meanwhile, I wish you all a great summer, and I hope to see you one day in the Museum, and even better – in Jerusalem!